|
The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Liamchat"
(→Ban liamchat request: new section) |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
*recoverymode-640x960.s5l8930x.img3: |
*recoverymode-640x960.s5l8930x.img3: |
||
--[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 22:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC) |
--[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 22:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Ban liamchat request == |
||
| + | |||
| + | There is a petition going on to ban liamchat from this wiki. I'm not sure how serious it is and nobody can vote for him there. So please comment here, pro and contra, preferrably with arguments. I think five users more against him with serious arguments would be enough. --[[User:Http|http]] 22:05, 17 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 22:05, 17 November 2010
Contents |
|
Archives |
| • 2010 • 2011 • |
KBAGs
Hello, Liamchat! I noticed that you've been adding KBAGs to the key pages. I certainly appreciate the addition of such information, but just listing KBAGs without mentioning which file they're for isn't exactly helpful. Would you mind mentioning which file each KBAG is for? --Dialexio 21:39, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- i added them because i don't have those devices and i think it may help people get the key's if i add them however the exact is
- 018-7074-092.dmg:
- 018-7082-092.dmg:
- DeviceTree.n90ap.img3:
- LLB.n90ap.RELEASE.img3:
- applelogo-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- batterycharging0-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- batterycharging1-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- batteryfull-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- batterylow0-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- batterylow1-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- glyphcharging-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- glyphplugin-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- iBEC.n90ap.RELEASE.dfu:
- iBSS.n90ap.RELEASE.dfu:
- iBoot.n90ap.RELEASE.img3:
- kernelcache.release.n81:
- recoverymode-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
--liamchat 22:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Ban liamchat request
There is a petition going on to ban liamchat from this wiki. I'm not sure how serious it is and nobody can vote for him there. So please comment here, pro and contra, preferrably with arguments. I think five users more against him with serious arguments would be enough. --http 22:05, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
