|
The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Liamchat"
(→Ban liamchat request) |
(clarifying) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
::I don't understand it eather but I do help by filling in the missing keys and check the Current ones --[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 22:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC) |
::I don't understand it eather but I do help by filling in the missing keys and check the Current ones --[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 22:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | Just to make it clear: Nobody will be banned just because others don't like someone. For a ban we need a clear majority of people with good arguments. --[[User:Http|http]] 22:52, 17 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
| − | Pros: |
||
| − | |||
| − | Cons: |
||
Revision as of 22:52, 17 November 2010
Contents |
|
Archives |
| • 2010 • 2011 • |
KBAGs
Hello, Liamchat! I noticed that you've been adding KBAGs to the key pages. I certainly appreciate the addition of such information, but just listing KBAGs without mentioning which file they're for isn't exactly helpful. Would you mind mentioning which file each KBAG is for? --Dialexio 21:39, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- i added them because i don't have those devices and i think it may help people get the key's if i add them however the exact is
- 018-7074-092.dmg:
- 018-7082-092.dmg:
- DeviceTree.n90ap.img3:
- LLB.n90ap.RELEASE.img3:
- applelogo-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- batterycharging0-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- batterycharging1-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- batteryfull-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- batterylow0-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- batterylow1-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- glyphcharging-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- glyphplugin-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- iBEC.n90ap.RELEASE.dfu:
- iBSS.n90ap.RELEASE.dfu:
- iBoot.n90ap.RELEASE.img3:
- kernelcache.release.n81:
- recoverymode-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
--liamchat 22:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Ban liamchat request
There is a petition going on to ban liamchat from this wiki (see here). I'm not sure how serious it is and nobody can vote for him there. So please comment here, pro and contra, preferrably with arguments. I think five users more against him with serious arguments would be enough. --http 22:05, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- ??? Why would you ban him? I havn't seen anything wrong he has done... Please give more info... --Balloonhead66 22:15, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- I don't understand it eather but I do help by filling in the missing keys and check the Current ones --liamchat 22:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
Just to make it clear: Nobody will be banned just because others don't like someone. For a ban we need a clear majority of people with good arguments. --http 22:52, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
