Talk:Constitution

There are inaccuracies in the constitution. I.e. "manifesto".

Why is the constitution treated specially?

I don't think you mean harm, but you are very uninformed for 2 or 3 of the items there.

Fix it as you see fit, I removed the protect. I realized that this isn't the place for my ideas, and if you are willing to contribute, every page will be editable.

anysim isn't an exploit, just a patcher.

anySim3rc3 was the first version to require the use of the bleichenbacher exploit. That's more than just a patch.

selective membership? whaaaaaa?

as far as I know, there are only devteam members that are wiki editors on iphone-deb.org. that is not exactly "selective membership" by the way that it isput anyway...

geohot, I think that protecting this page would be a good idea, because it seems that confused people that mean no harm are editting out things as well as adding false facts. why not just have people flow. their ideas via this page and you can add them to the main page. this is just to weed out the uninformed information. although mn said that it's not a wiki if this page is protected, think about the.locked pages on wikipefia, or even just thinking about the state of iphone-dev.org should suffice :)

spam

I think spam has been pretty well handled. Few bots go to all the trouble of creating an account and confirming it. And I have some "secret" anti-spam stuff which seems to be working. So dev, so much for that excuse. ~geohot

And yet if you look at the final weeks of fiveforty, it was completely overrun by spam, even with account registration requirements. If you want to go off all day and tweak your "secret" anti-spam stuff, go right ahead. We chose to direct our efforts elsewhere.

I've already taken care of spam for you. Just post here.

drama

@chronic: IMHO it is better to omit some points to progress in the right direction. Especially if said points are strongly subjective. Don't you think it is a little bit contradictory to promote neutral articles and to place higly subjective points of view on the same page? And even if you personally think it is all true, you would accomodate some people if you change the article. I would appreciate switching back to the proposed no drama version. -caique2001-