|
The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:AT+XNONCE"
(→Baseband hacking: new section) |
(answer to wipe) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == XNONCE == |
||
Actually it's at+xnonce?, not at+nonce :) |
Actually it's at+xnonce?, not at+nonce :) |
||
== Baseband hacking == |
== Baseband hacking == |
||
| − | |||
Here's an idea... couldn't we wipe the baseband device completely (no XNONCE, etc) and then have iTunes restore whatever baseband we wanted? iTunes simply flashes the chip anyhow, so wiping it wouldn't mess anything up (besides the currently active firmware, but if done in DFU, then who cares.) And yes, I realize that there would be no signature for the baseband, but then again, there'd also be no reason for baseband signature. I probably sound like an idiot, but hey, it's just an idea. |
Here's an idea... couldn't we wipe the baseband device completely (no XNONCE, etc) and then have iTunes restore whatever baseband we wanted? iTunes simply flashes the chip anyhow, so wiping it wouldn't mess anything up (besides the currently active firmware, but if done in DFU, then who cares.) And yes, I realize that there would be no signature for the baseband, but then again, there'd also be no reason for baseband signature. I probably sound like an idiot, but hey, it's just an idea. |
||
--[[User:Rdqronos|rdqronos]] 18:26, 20 September 2011 (MDT) |
--[[User:Rdqronos|rdqronos]] 18:26, 20 September 2011 (MDT) |
||
| + | :The nonce is probably created on boot in the baseband bootrom code which cannot be changed or wiped. --[[User:Http|http]] 23:14, 20 September 2011 (MDT) |
||
Latest revision as of 05:14, 21 September 2011
XNONCE
Actually it's at+xnonce?, not at+nonce :)
Baseband hacking
Here's an idea... couldn't we wipe the baseband device completely (no XNONCE, etc) and then have iTunes restore whatever baseband we wanted? iTunes simply flashes the chip anyhow, so wiping it wouldn't mess anything up (besides the currently active firmware, but if done in DFU, then who cares.) And yes, I realize that there would be no signature for the baseband, but then again, there'd also be no reason for baseband signature. I probably sound like an idiot, but hey, it's just an idea. --rdqronos 18:26, 20 September 2011 (MDT)
- The nonce is probably created on boot in the baseband bootrom code which cannot be changed or wiped. --http 23:14, 20 September 2011 (MDT)
