Difference between revisions of "Talk:Seczone"

From The iPhone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Any chance we could create a new seczone for a specific carrier that would overwrite the current one therefore re-locking it to another carrier or would that be too much work/impossible. Just a question ~sam
+
Any chance we could create a new seczone for a specific carrier that would overwrite the current one therefore re-locking it to another carrier or would that be too much work/impossible. Just a question. [i know this would be illegal in england but in the states?] ~sam
  +
:Requires access to the baseband chip itself, which requires an exploit, which we don't exactly have yet. --[[User:Rdqronos|rdqronos]] 13:44, 22 October 2011 (MDT)
   
 
but is the lock not in nck? -[[User:Rekoil|Rekoil]] 21:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 
but is the lock not in nck? -[[User:Rekoil|Rekoil]] 21:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
  +
  +
It is where the token that talks to the nck and tells it its locked state.

Latest revision as of 19:44, 22 October 2011

Any chance we could create a new seczone for a specific carrier that would overwrite the current one therefore re-locking it to another carrier or would that be too much work/impossible. Just a question. [i know this would be illegal in england but in the states?] ~sam

Requires access to the baseband chip itself, which requires an exploit, which we don't exactly have yet. --rdqronos 13:44, 22 October 2011 (MDT)

but is the lock not in nck? -Rekoil 21:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

It is where the token that talks to the nck and tells it its locked state.