Talk:Tethered jailbreak

I suggest no work should be done on making it untethered until the iphone 3,1 is released. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by Revolution (talk) 01:01, October 15, 2009 (EST). Please consult this page for more info on how to sign pages, and how to fix this.

No work done until iPhone3,1? That's a stretch. How about no public-work / for release until iPhone 3,1. If no jailbreakable iPhone3,1 in July, then no upgrade (for me) from iPhone2,1 :) . Iemit737 02:49, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

thats probably what revolution implied :P ChronicDev 03:05, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Really I think no work at all since nitrokey published the exploit being kept in secret I think no work should be done so there is no risk of any compromise. and secondly if nitrokey got access to an unpublished exploit twice I think that there should be more security about all of this. Since nitrokey stole the a baseband exploit and a bootrom exploit. Soz about my rambling Im very tired Revolution 04:02, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

actually NitroKey stole 2 baseband exploits from devteam and then 1 boootrom exploit from us, so they burned a potential unlock vector making them bigger douches :P

anyway, info was a bit more "loose" at the time, and we have definitely taken measures to secure all of our private information. If you were implying that any new secret info that we find will be seen by nitrokey, then we are already screwed by that logic. ChronicDev 05:02, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

re-write

it looks to me like this whole page could use a re-write, but as i'm not offering to do it, i suppose i shouldn't complain ;) in any case, how should we incorporate info on BigBoss's new "semitethered jailbreak" package? see http://thebigboss.org/semitethered-jailbreak --beej 19:38, 22 October 2011 (MDT)