|
The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Siri Protocol"
(→Original article deleted) |
(→Original article deleted) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Anybody knows why the original article has been removed? -- [[User:Http|http]] 14:38, 27 November 2011 (MST) |
Anybody knows why the original article has been removed? -- [[User:Http|http]] 14:38, 27 November 2011 (MST) |
||
| − | : |
+ | :Probably Apple's lawyers came around? --[[User:M2m|M2m]] 04:39, 28 November 2011 (MST) |
| + | ::If documenting the protocol would be illegal, then we would have to remove it here as well (it isn't). -- [[User:Http|http]] 10:18, 28 November 2011 (MST) |
||
| + | :::Pure guessing from my side - but as Applidium are also AppStore Devs, probably Apple threatened them with some NDA stuff and to ban their Apps. --[[User:M2m|M2m]] 17:01, 28 November 2011 (MST) |
||
Latest revision as of 00:01, 29 November 2011
Is there any further information about the X-Ace-Host ID available ? How is it formed ? Is it the ECID, IMEI ? Something else ? --M2m 19:35, 26 November 2011 (MST)
- The number is just grabbed from an existing communication. According to some articles I've read it's more like a ticket number, valid for 24 hours. The original authetication algorithm is "heavily obfuscated in the code". At least this is my understanding. -- http 14:37, 27 November 2011 (MST)
Original article deleted
Anybody knows why the original article has been removed? -- http 14:38, 27 November 2011 (MST)
- Probably Apple's lawyers came around? --M2m 04:39, 28 November 2011 (MST)
- If documenting the protocol would be illegal, then we would have to remove it here as well (it isn't). -- http 10:18, 28 November 2011 (MST)
- Pure guessing from my side - but as Applidium are also AppStore Devs, probably Apple threatened them with some NDA stuff and to ban their Apps. --M2m 17:01, 28 November 2011 (MST)
- If documenting the protocol would be illegal, then we would have to remove it here as well (it isn't). -- http 10:18, 28 November 2011 (MST)
