|
The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:AT+XEMN Heap Overflow"
(→exploit explanation: new section) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Apple will fix it because iH8sn0w disclosed it, not because we are discussing it here. --[[User:Oranav|oranav]] 17:28, 28 October 2009 (UTC) |
:Apple will fix it because iH8sn0w disclosed it, not because we are discussing it here. --[[User:Oranav|oranav]] 17:28, 28 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Besides, there is a big install base using the affected baseband. The faster this is converted into a soft unlock, the better. [[User:Haldo|Haldo]] 19:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC) |
:Besides, there is a big install base using the affected baseband. The faster this is converted into a soft unlock, the better. [[User:Haldo|Haldo]] 19:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | == exploit explanation == |
||
| + | |||
| + | geohot, can you explain how the exploit works? heap chunk pointer overwrites? |
||
Latest revision as of 10:40, 4 November 2009
Don't you think that public discussion of this vulnerability will allow Apple to fix it in the upcoming update and make all this discussions totaly useless? --Redart 16:34, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- Apple will fix it because iH8sn0w disclosed it, not because we are discussing it here. --oranav 17:28, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
- Besides, there is a big install base using the affected baseband. The faster this is converted into a soft unlock, the better. Haldo 19:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
exploit explanation
geohot, can you explain how the exploit works? heap chunk pointer overwrites?
