Difference between revisions of "Talk:AT+stkprof"

Latest revision as of 15:57, 4 November 2009

props Darkmen, that is some epic shit right there :)

it's on the wrong topic

yeah now that i think of it, thats for the yellowsn0w payload. ill move it.

How did the exploit was found? By disassembling the baseband firmware code and analyzing it? Or fuzzing or something like that?

I typed stuff until it crashed...--geohot 17:05, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Random AT commands?

It isn't the code they're using. Even the syntax is wrong (it gets a length as the first parameter)

However, extracting it from the yellowsn0w binary is easy.

~Oranav

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 props Darkmen, that is some epic shit right there :)
+== wrong topic ==
+it's on the wrong topic
+== ah ==
+yeah now that i think of it, thats for the yellowsn0w payload. ill move it.
+== just for general knowledge ==
+How did the exploit was found? By disassembling the baseband firmware code and analyzing it? Or fuzzing or something like that?
+:I typed stuff until it crashed...--[[User:Geohot|geohot]] 17:05, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
+::Random AT commands?
+== New Implementation (yellowsn0w 0.9.6) is wrong ==
+It isn't the code they're using. Even the syntax is wrong (it gets a length as the first parameter)
+However, extracting it from the yellowsn0w binary is easy.
+~Oranav