Difference between revisions of "Talk:AT+stkprof"

From The iPhone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New Implementation (yellowsn0w 0.9.6) is wrong: new section)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
== New Implementation (yellowsn0w 0.9.6) is wrong ==
 
== New Implementation (yellowsn0w 0.9.6) is wrong ==
   
It isn't the code they're using. Even the at+stkprof syntax is wrong (it gets a length as the first parameter)
+
It isn't the code they're using. Even the syntax is wrong (it gets a length as the first parameter)
   
 
However, extracting it from the yellowsn0w binary is easy.
 
However, extracting it from the yellowsn0w binary is easy.
  +
  +
~Oranav

Latest revision as of 15:57, 4 November 2009

damn

props Darkmen, that is some epic shit right there :)

wrong topic

it's on the wrong topic

ah

yeah now that i think of it, thats for the yellowsn0w payload. ill move it.

just for general knowledge

How did the exploit was found? By disassembling the baseband firmware code and analyzing it? Or fuzzing or something like that?

I typed stuff until it crashed...--geohot 17:05, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Random AT commands?

New Implementation (yellowsn0w 0.9.6) is wrong

It isn't the code they're using. Even the syntax is wrong (it gets a length as the first parameter)

However, extracting it from the yellowsn0w binary is easy.

~Oranav