The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Keynote"
m (weird) |
m (→Alternative to Tables) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=== Spring forward. === |
=== Spring forward. === |
||
* Date: {{date|2015|03|09}} |
* Date: {{date|2015|03|09}} |
||
− | * Official URL: [http://www.apple.com/live/2015-mar-event/ apple.com/live/2015-mar-event |
+ | * Official URL: [http://www.apple.com/live/2015-mar-event/ apple.com/live/2015-mar-event] |
* Key Points: [[Apple Watch (1st generation)]] |
* Key Points: [[Apple Watch (1st generation)]] |
||
* Streams |
* Streams |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
</blockquote> |
</blockquote> |
||
Any thoughts? --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 15:34, 12 September 2017 (UTC) |
Any thoughts? --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 15:34, 12 September 2017 (UTC) |
||
+ | :Personally, I think it looks much nicer in a table and is easier to read. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 15:54, 12 September 2017 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 15:55, 12 September 2017
Contents
Bulleted lists
I don't really like the use of bulleted lists on this page, especially for table cells that have just one link... Is the point of the bullets to separate/denote the number of links or something? --Dialexio 10:44, 15 September 2012 (MDT)
- It was to separate the different links for one thing (>2). For ones with one link, I tried it without them in preview, but it didn't look good to me. --5urd 12:12, 15 September 2012 (MDT)
Partially Broken
What does (partially) broken
mean? It works sometimes, but not all? This would be a good note to add to the bottom of the page. --5urd 19:03, September 17, 2012 (MDT)
- Just take a look at the page for yourself. Parts of it show up fine, but there are very noticeable quirks since Apple changed their site's appearance over the past few years. --Dialexio 15:01, 17 September 2012 (MDT)
Sort in Reverse Chronological Order
I was wondering if it would be OK to change the way the events are listed on the page, and start with the newest at the top to oldest at the bottom? --MWoolweaver (talk) 05:31, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Alternative to Tables
So, I get why tables are used, and the links do fit nicely within them, but it looks wrong to me. After all, this isn't tabular data. I thought maybe bullets would work? So for 2015's Spring forward event, it could look something like this:
Spring forward.
- Date: 9 March 2015
- Official URL: apple.com/live/2015-mar-event
- Key Points: Apple Watch (1st generation)
- Streams
- MP4 Stream
- HLS Stream (
m3u8
)- Subtitles (
vtt
)- Podcasts (
m4v
)