|
The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:VROM"
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Merge with [[bootrom]]?== |
==Merge with [[bootrom]]?== |
||
I'm thinking about renaming everything "VROM" to "Bootrom," since bootrom is used more often throughout the wiki. Anyone have objections to this move? --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 20:51, 7 August 2010 (UTC) |
I'm thinking about renaming everything "VROM" to "Bootrom," since bootrom is used more often throughout the wiki. Anyone have objections to this move? --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 20:51, 7 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :Sounds good. I was already wondering what VROM is.. I only knew Bootrom {{unsigned|Chrisu de|23:13, August 7, 2010}} |
||
| + | |||
| + | :I also didn't know that this is the same. But I think a redirect on VROM to bootrom would be wrong, because there are references to it. If someone want to know what VROM is, he should find that out easily. At least we should leave the main article (quite empty now) and explain there what the acronym stands for and that it's the same as bootrom (with link) and why it's not used anymore. If you really want to get rid of it completely, we should add such an explanation section into the beginning of the bootrom page. For me it's much like the term [[QuickPwn]], which isn't used anymore, but still is referenced a lot in old articles etc so having that [[QuickPwn]] explanation page is good I think. -- [[User:Http|http]] 01:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | ::All right, that sounds good. I'm going ahead with it. --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 03:17, 8 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 03:17, 8 August 2010
Merge with bootrom?
I'm thinking about renaming everything "VROM" to "Bootrom," since bootrom is used more often throughout the wiki. Anyone have objections to this move? --Dialexio 20:51, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
- Sounds good. I was already wondering what VROM is.. I only knew Bootrom --The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chrisu de (talk) 23:13, August 7, 2010. Please consult this page for more info on how to sign pages, and how to fix this.
- I also didn't know that this is the same. But I think a redirect on VROM to bootrom would be wrong, because there are references to it. If someone want to know what VROM is, he should find that out easily. At least we should leave the main article (quite empty now) and explain there what the acronym stands for and that it's the same as bootrom (with link) and why it's not used anymore. If you really want to get rid of it completely, we should add such an explanation section into the beginning of the bootrom page. For me it's much like the term QuickPwn, which isn't used anymore, but still is referenced a lot in old articles etc so having that QuickPwn explanation page is good I think. -- http 01:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
- All right, that sounds good. I'm going ahead with it. --Dialexio 03:17, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
