Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Unsigned"

From The iPhone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Comment about new text)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
   
 
Hi [[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]]! You forgot to change the sample with the new text. Also, I disagree that the users should not update their missing signature. Why? Because telling them that they have a missing signature is ok, but it's also quite offensive. So they will try to fix their mistake. If they are not allowed to fix their mistake, the offensive texts on them will remain. To exagerate a little: Assume we would make the text even more offensive and you forgot it somewhere it might read: ''"The user [[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] has forgotten his signature here, although he's a sysop and would know that. He's the worst user ever."'' That's not good. You would also wan't to fix that. Maybe you can add instructions on how to fix the problem in a standard way instead? Maybe a link to a new page with instructions? -- [[User:Http|http]] 21:58, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
 
Hi [[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]]! You forgot to change the sample with the new text. Also, I disagree that the users should not update their missing signature. Why? Because telling them that they have a missing signature is ok, but it's also quite offensive. So they will try to fix their mistake. If they are not allowed to fix their mistake, the offensive texts on them will remain. To exagerate a little: Assume we would make the text even more offensive and you forgot it somewhere it might read: ''"The user [[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]] has forgotten his signature here, although he's a sysop and would know that. He's the worst user ever."'' That's not good. You would also wan't to fix that. Maybe you can add instructions on how to fix the problem in a standard way instead? Maybe a link to a new page with instructions? -- [[User:Http|http]] 21:58, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
:I have no problem with people correcting the signature, but rather I have a problem when the missing signature isn't fixed ''properly'' (primarily, an incorrect timestamp... I have issues for being that anal about something so trivial). I see how it may come off as harsh, so I'll change the added message to what you suggested (a guide to fix the missing signature) later. I probably should've gotten some feedback on adding such text. Sorry about that. :\ --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 22:55, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
  +
:Fixed now! --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 02:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:11, 11 August 2010

New disallow to fix

Hi Dialexio! You forgot to change the sample with the new text. Also, I disagree that the users should not update their missing signature. Why? Because telling them that they have a missing signature is ok, but it's also quite offensive. So they will try to fix their mistake. If they are not allowed to fix their mistake, the offensive texts on them will remain. To exagerate a little: Assume we would make the text even more offensive and you forgot it somewhere it might read: "The user Dialexio has forgotten his signature here, although he's a sysop and would know that. He's the worst user ever." That's not good. You would also wan't to fix that. Maybe you can add instructions on how to fix the problem in a standard way instead? Maybe a link to a new page with instructions? -- http 21:58, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

I have no problem with people correcting the signature, but rather I have a problem when the missing signature isn't fixed properly (primarily, an incorrect timestamp... I have issues for being that anal about something so trivial). I see how it may come off as harsh, so I'll change the added message to what you suggested (a guide to fix the missing signature) later. I probably should've gotten some feedback on adding such text. Sorry about that. :\ --Dialexio 22:55, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Fixed now! --Dialexio 02:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)