|
The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Baseband Bootloader"
(are there command's in the baseband_bootloader) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I found an exploit in 5.8, wait for details, I'll write it up. If it does what I think it does, it'll allow downgrades. |
I found an exploit in 5.8, wait for details, I'll write it up. If it does what I think it does, it'll allow downgrades. |
||
| + | |||
| + | == [[baseband_bootloader]] command's == |
||
| + | are there command's in the [[baseband_bootloader]] because when the baseband updates it need's to restart and not boot the [[Baseband_Firmware]] and to do that the rdisk need's to talk to the [[baseband_bootloader]] --[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 19:08, 28 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 19:08, 28 September 2010
5.8
The fact that dev team could change the baseband firmware implies there is an exploit, doesn't it?
I guess that the 5.8 exploit doesn't allow unlock because of sigcheck. Is the bootloaders 5.8 or 5.9 in the ramdisks? And is it possible to downgrade from 5.9 to 5.8 (maybe running some code in the baseband thru the at+stkprof to ask to erase the bootloader). Last thing, does 5.8 allow downgrading from any baseband? dranfi 4/10/09
drg
There's an exploit somewhere, but it's not publicly known where.
geohot
They claimed to use the buffer overflows.
I found an exploit in 5.8, wait for details, I'll write it up. If it does what I think it does, it'll allow downgrades.
baseband_bootloader command's
are there command's in the baseband_bootloader because when the baseband updates it need's to restart and not boot the Baseband_Firmware and to do that the rdisk need's to talk to the baseband_bootloader --liamchat 19:08, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
