Talk:/dev

Devices that the Nodes were gathered from

Can we say witch devices have the nodes because it will get confusing once the page is complete --liamchat 22:56, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Let's try with [1]--Ryccardo 14:09, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Hey, I don't think colors are a good thing. A lot of devices are available on all models. We should make a table row for every device and use Yes and No.--Ryccardo 19:13, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Can someone please change {{partial|ipad 3g}} to {{partial|[[K48ap|iPad Wifi+3G}} ? --5urd 22:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Split the table?

It looks like maintaining the table for the future is going to get a bit messy. Therefore, I would like to propose splitting the table based on file name. Does this sound good to everyone? --Dialexio 22:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

i think it look ok for now because when i started the page it was upside and when more info is found about the node's then we can split the table's --liamchat 22:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Progress

can we use this to keep track of what node's are for witch devices and the proof of it --liamchat 23:16, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Devices	iPhone	iPhone3G	iPhone 3GS	iPhone 4	iPod touch	iPod touch 2G	iPod touch 3G	iPod touch 4G	iPad 1G	Apple TV 2G
Data From	No	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No	No	No	No

What Now?

What are we going to do now? With so many devices, I think we should just list this like any other firmware page with just flat links with a description parenthesis next to the link. We could have devices handled on the page itself? --5urd 14:30, 27 October 2012 (MDT)

One other suggestion I have is to split it up by iDevice (separate tables for Apple TV, iPad, iPhone, and iPod touch). Unless someone suggests something else, I'm gonna go ahead and make the change. --5urd (talk) 15:17, 16 March 2015 (UTC)