|
The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:AT+XAPP Vulnerability"
(Missing signature.) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
So if someone could please give a small intro as to how to find the AT+ commands (main) routine, please fill out. Thanks in advance! ~toomuchjames |
So if someone could please give a small intro as to how to find the AT+ commands (main) routine, please fill out. Thanks in advance! ~toomuchjames |
||
| + | Anyone? {{unsigned|toomuchjames|14:18, August 13, 2010 (UTC)}} |
||
| − | Anyone? |
||
Okay so like this can't be real can it? I know it's not relavant to this exploit but I just wanna know. |
Okay so like this can't be real can it? I know it's not relavant to this exploit but I just wanna know. |
||
http://pastie.org/pastes/1568212 [[User:Leobruh|Leobruh]] 23:20, 24 February 2011 (UTC)! |
http://pastie.org/pastes/1568212 [[User:Leobruh|Leobruh]] 23:20, 24 February 2011 (UTC)! |
||
| + | |||
| + | I know that the BB bootloader signature checks everything on bootup so a permanent unlock is out of discussion. But can this exploit be used with a payload to downgrade the baseband to an older signed version? {{unsigned|Clrokr|02:23, March 14, 2011 (UTC)}} |
||
Latest revision as of 03:05, 14 March 2011
I try to find the xapp command in the disassembly. Is it right that it is in the stack.fls file? I cant find a "xapp" string ... Can someone help me? ~chrisude
In a more general sense I'd like to know the same. As to not being able to find the xapp string, which baseband are you looking at? I can verify that the 05.11.07 baseband does have xapp (at offset 62F5AF, 63B217, 37E4D5 (and xapp_get at 513D18, cmd_xapp.app at 632619). Which you're suppose to look at exactly I'd like to know also. So if someone could please give a small intro as to how to find the AT+ commands (main) routine, please fill out. Thanks in advance! ~toomuchjames
Anyone? --The preceding unsigned comment was added by toomuchjames (talk) 14:18, August 13, 2010 (UTC). Please consult this page for more info on how to sign pages, and how to fix this.
Okay so like this can't be real can it? I know it's not relavant to this exploit but I just wanna know. http://pastie.org/pastes/1568212 Leobruh 23:20, 24 February 2011 (UTC)!
I know that the BB bootloader signature checks everything on bootup so a permanent unlock is out of discussion. But can this exploit be used with a payload to downgrade the baseband to an older signed version? --The preceding unsigned comment was added by Clrokr (talk) 02:23, March 14, 2011 (UTC). Please consult this page for more info on how to sign pages, and how to fix this.
