|
The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "T1 Font Integer Overflow"
m (→Sources) |
m |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The '''T1 Font Integer Overflow''' ( |
+ | The '''T1 Font Integer Overflow''' (a.k.a '''DejaVu''' as it is very similar to the [[Malformed CFF Vulnerability]][https://twitter.com/comex/status/88208990789578752]) is an exploit used in [[Saffron]]. |
| − | == Credit |
+ | == Credit == |
* [[User:comex|comex]] |
* [[User:comex|comex]] |
||
== Description == |
== Description == |
||
| − | When dealing with op_callothersubr, arg_cnt is defined as an integer. arg_cnt is read from decoder‑>stack, which could be set to 0xfea50000 by charstring "fb ef". And this will bypass stack checking. Then "top ‑= arg_cnt" will make top point to data outside of decoder‑>stack. Actually it points to decoder‑>parse_callback. decoder |
+ | When dealing with op_callothersubr, arg_cnt is defined as an integer. arg_cnt is read from decoder‑>stack, which could be set to <code>0xfea50000</code> by charstring "fb ef". And this will bypass stack checking. Then "top ‑= arg_cnt" will make top point to data outside of decoder‑>stack. Actually it points to decoder‑>parse_callback. decoder‑>parse_callback address minus default address of that function to get ASLR offset. That's how it bypasses ASLR. |
| − | This vulnerability was actually addressed by Apple in |
+ | This vulnerability was actually addressed by Apple in [[wikipedia:Mac OS X Snow Leopard|OS X v10.6.8]] ([http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4723 Security Update 2011-004]), but a fix was never pushed to [[iOS]]. (CVE-2011-0202). |
| + | When Apple released iOS 4.2.9/4.3.4 to patch this vulnerability, it received a different CVE identifier (CVE-2011-0226). |
||
| − | ==Sources== |
||
| + | |||
| − | * Tweets from [https://twitter.com/windknown @windknown]: [https://twitter.com/windknown/status/88170553948651520][https://twitter.com/windknown/status/88171950886760448][https://twitter.com/windknown/status/88172830029651968][https://twitter.com/windknown/status/88173940391940096] |
||
| + | == External Links == |
||
| − | * [http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4723 Apple KB] |
||
| + | * Tweets from <span class="plainlinks">@[https://twitter.com/windknown windknown]: [https://twitter.com/windknown/status/88170553948651520 1] [https://twitter.com/windknown/status/88171950886760448 2] [https://twitter.com/windknown/status/88172830029651968 3] [https://twitter.com/windknown/status/88173940391940096 4]</span> |
||
| − | * http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-0202 |
||
| + | * [http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4723 KB HT4723] |
||
| + | * [http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-0202 CVE-2011-0202] |
||
| + | * [http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-0226 CVE-2011-0226] |
||
| + | * [http://intrepidusgroup.com/insight/2011/07/reversing-jailbreakme-com-4/ Analasis by Intrepid US Group] |
||
| + | * [http://esec-lab.sogeti.com/post/Analysis-of-the-jailbreakme-v3-font-exploit Analasis by Sogeti ESEC Labs] |
||
[[Category:Exploits]] |
[[Category:Exploits]] |
||
Latest revision as of 00:12, 10 October 2012
The T1 Font Integer Overflow (a.k.a DejaVu as it is very similar to the Malformed CFF Vulnerability[1]) is an exploit used in Saffron.
Credit
Description
When dealing with op_callothersubr, arg_cnt is defined as an integer. arg_cnt is read from decoder‑>stack, which could be set to 0xfea50000 by charstring "fb ef". And this will bypass stack checking. Then "top ‑= arg_cnt" will make top point to data outside of decoder‑>stack. Actually it points to decoder‑>parse_callback. decoder‑>parse_callback address minus default address of that function to get ASLR offset. That's how it bypasses ASLR.
This vulnerability was actually addressed by Apple in OS X v10.6.8 (Security Update 2011-004), but a fix was never pushed to iOS. (CVE-2011-0202).
When Apple released iOS 4.2.9/4.3.4 to patch this vulnerability, it received a different CVE identifier (CVE-2011-0226).
