|
The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:S5L8942"
(more comments) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == Exploit Listing == |
||
Why is an exploit listed on a processor page? (Same applies to the other processors.) The Raccoon exploit is in no way related to the processor. Can we remove that here and everywhere? The only vulnerabilites or exploits listed on a processor page should be those that are in the processor, i.e. in the bootrom. I suggest that we create iOS version pages and put these exploits in there. Anyone against this? -- [[User:Http|http]] 14:23, 24 October 2012 (MDT) |
Why is an exploit listed on a processor page? (Same applies to the other processors.) The Raccoon exploit is in no way related to the processor. Can we remove that here and everywhere? The only vulnerabilites or exploits listed on a processor page should be those that are in the processor, i.e. in the bootrom. I suggest that we create iOS version pages and put these exploits in there. Anyone against this? -- [[User:Http|http]] 14:23, 24 October 2012 (MDT) |
||
:I agree, except for that last bit. I think it'd be better to list the software-based vulnerabilities all on one page, and split into different sections based on which firmwares they're exploited on. --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 23:29, 24 October 2012 (MDT) |
:I agree, except for that last bit. I think it'd be better to list the software-based vulnerabilities all on one page, and split into different sections based on which firmwares they're exploited on. --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 23:29, 24 October 2012 (MDT) |
||
| + | ::We already have that: [[Jailbreak]] <code>:/</code> --[[User:5urd|5urd]] 09:31, 25 October 2012 (MDT) |
||
| + | :::Oh, you're right; we have such an overview already. Maybe that should go to the Firmware or iOS page, because on [[Jailbreak|the jailbreak page]] people expect a general description of a jailbreak and the chart that's there at the bottom. But anyway, I think we still should have a separate page for every iOS version, at least for major versions. We could describe there what the changes were and what vulnerabilities we have in that version (and what was fixed compared to the previous version). But that's not the top priority. As far as I understand you two, you agree to remove the non-hardware related vulnerabilites from the CPU pages. We'll keep only the bootrom vulnerabilities on the CPU page. I'll move forward with that removal then. --[[User:Http|http]] 14:53, 25 October 2012 (MDT) |
||
Latest revision as of 20:53, 25 October 2012
Exploit Listing
Why is an exploit listed on a processor page? (Same applies to the other processors.) The Raccoon exploit is in no way related to the processor. Can we remove that here and everywhere? The only vulnerabilites or exploits listed on a processor page should be those that are in the processor, i.e. in the bootrom. I suggest that we create iOS version pages and put these exploits in there. Anyone against this? -- http 14:23, 24 October 2012 (MDT)
- I agree, except for that last bit. I think it'd be better to list the software-based vulnerabilities all on one page, and split into different sections based on which firmwares they're exploited on. --Dialexio 23:29, 24 October 2012 (MDT)
- We already have that: Jailbreak
:/--5urd 09:31, 25 October 2012 (MDT)- Oh, you're right; we have such an overview already. Maybe that should go to the Firmware or iOS page, because on the jailbreak page people expect a general description of a jailbreak and the chart that's there at the bottom. But anyway, I think we still should have a separate page for every iOS version, at least for major versions. We could describe there what the changes were and what vulnerabilities we have in that version (and what was fixed compared to the previous version). But that's not the top priority. As far as I understand you two, you agree to remove the non-hardware related vulnerabilites from the CPU pages. We'll keep only the bootrom vulnerabilities on the CPU page. I'll move forward with that removal then. --http 14:53, 25 October 2012 (MDT)
- We already have that: Jailbreak
