The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Baseband Bootrom"
ChronicDev (talk | contribs) (→hardware: new section) |
m |
||
(27 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ==xgold bootrom - random hw notes== |
||
− | ==Q/A== |
||
+ | * '''bootrom''': 0x400000 |
||
− | How would someone even go about dumping the bootrom? |
||
+ | * '''NOR''': 0x20000000 |
||
− | == |
+ | == Deletion. == |
+ | I disagree with the deletion. We should remove the deletion marker and add more information to this page. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 18:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | :That's fair, but do NOT remove deletion markers unless a discussion reached a consensus. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 21:05, 17 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | :: Ok sorry. I won't in future. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 21:24, 17 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | :: Is it ok to remove now as there is no one saying otherwise? --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 14:11, 19 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | :: I disagree with the deletion. This is an important page, although it doesn't contain a lot of information yet. It was created by [[User:Geohot|geohot]] himself. And I agree with [[User:5urd|5urd]] that before making changes you should wait until there's an agreement. --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 16:32, 19 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | ::: Ok. Is it ok to do so now as we seem to have agreed? --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 16:43, 19 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | :::: Wait a few days more. Not everybody checks for wiki changes every hour. If no more comments come in until Monday night, yes, remove the marker. --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 17:04, 19 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | ::::: Ok sure. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 18:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | :::::: Why would we ever delete pages because they are old? --[[User:Geohot|geohot]] ([[User talk:Geohot|talk]]) 18:09, 19 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | ::::::: Exactly. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 18:18, 19 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | ::::::: Old pages should never get deleted, I fully support that. But there are some pages with rare and long names and without useful content. I do not oppose if people want to merge its content into other pages (or titles with typos), but I oppose losing any information. This case here is pretty obvious that we'll keep it, I just wanted to follow standard procedures (discuss and agree before doing changes). Maybe you can look through the deleted log? Having more active admins now, there are more deletions to verify. --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 19:41, 19 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | == Move Content Request == |
||
− | most deff a hardware method. unless we found an exploit to dump it, but that would totally defeat the purpose, because we need a dump to find an exploit, and because if we found an exploit we wouldn't need to dump it again. |
||
+ | IMHO, this page's content should be moved to the pages on the baseband devices themselves (i.e. move the [[Baseband Bootrom#S-Gold 2|S-Gold 2]] section to [[S-Gold 2]]'s page). --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 20:21, 19 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | : Actually yes that would make sense. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]]) 20:23, 19 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | : We can do that if you want, but this page must remain. It would be quite empty then. Just links to the other pages? I prefer to have all bb bootrom infos here, at least an overview. With more infos this changes of course. --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 12:05, 20 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | :: Then its best to leave it here. --[[User:IAdam1n|iAdam1n]] ([[User talk:IAdam1n|talk]])) 13:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 15:47, 20 August 2013
xgold bootrom - random hw notes
- bootrom: 0x400000
- NOR: 0x20000000
Deletion.
I disagree with the deletion. We should remove the deletion marker and add more information to this page. --iAdam1n (talk) 18:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- That's fair, but do NOT remove deletion markers unless a discussion reached a consensus. --5urd (talk) 21:05, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ok sorry. I won't in future. --iAdam1n (talk) 21:24, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Is it ok to remove now as there is no one saying otherwise? --iAdam1n (talk) 14:11, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- I disagree with the deletion. This is an important page, although it doesn't contain a lot of information yet. It was created by geohot himself. And I agree with 5urd that before making changes you should wait until there's an agreement. --http (talk) 16:32, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ok. Is it ok to do so now as we seem to have agreed? --iAdam1n (talk) 16:43, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Wait a few days more. Not everybody checks for wiki changes every hour. If no more comments come in until Monday night, yes, remove the marker. --http (talk) 17:04, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ok sure. --iAdam1n (talk) 18:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Why would we ever delete pages because they are old? --geohot (talk) 18:09, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Exactly. --iAdam1n (talk) 18:18, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Old pages should never get deleted, I fully support that. But there are some pages with rare and long names and without useful content. I do not oppose if people want to merge its content into other pages (or titles with typos), but I oppose losing any information. This case here is pretty obvious that we'll keep it, I just wanted to follow standard procedures (discuss and agree before doing changes). Maybe you can look through the deleted log? Having more active admins now, there are more deletions to verify. --http (talk) 19:41, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Why would we ever delete pages because they are old? --geohot (talk) 18:09, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ok sure. --iAdam1n (talk) 18:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Wait a few days more. Not everybody checks for wiki changes every hour. If no more comments come in until Monday night, yes, remove the marker. --http (talk) 17:04, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ok. Is it ok to do so now as we seem to have agreed? --iAdam1n (talk) 16:43, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Move Content Request
IMHO, this page's content should be moved to the pages on the baseband devices themselves (i.e. move the S-Gold 2 section to S-Gold 2's page). --5urd (talk) 20:21, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Actually yes that would make sense. --iAdam1n (talk) 20:23, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- We can do that if you want, but this page must remain. It would be quite empty then. Just links to the other pages? I prefer to have all bb bootrom infos here, at least an overview. With more infos this changes of course. --http (talk) 12:05, 20 January 2013 (UTC)