Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pwnage 2.0"

Revision as of 21:49, 23 October 2010

Can anyone post the file structure for the certificate and the malformed certificate? --paulzero 06:24, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Shouldn't this be merged with Pwnage? --Palz 21:23, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

It's a different exploit than Pwnage if I understood this correctly. Every exploit should have its own page. --http 21:47, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Yes, but pwnage2.0 is listed and defined here. --Palz 21:49, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 Shouldn't this be merged with Pwnage? --[[User:Palz|Palz]] 21:23, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 :It's a different exploit than [[Pwnage]] if I understood this correctly. Every exploit should have its own page. --[[User:Http|http]] 21:47, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
+::Yes, but pwnage2.0 is listed and defined here. --[[User:Palz|Palz]] 21:49, 23 October 2010 (UTC)