|
The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:S5L8942"
(There are no such processor vulnerabilites) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why is an exploit listed on a processor page? (Same applies to the other processors.) The Raccoon exploit is in no way related to the processor. Can we remove that here and everywhere? The only vulnerabilites or exploits listed on a processor page should be those that are in the processor, i.e. in the bootrom. I suggest that we create iOS version pages and put these exploits in there. Anyone against this? -- [[User:Http|http]] 14:23, 24 October 2012 (MDT) |
Why is an exploit listed on a processor page? (Same applies to the other processors.) The Raccoon exploit is in no way related to the processor. Can we remove that here and everywhere? The only vulnerabilites or exploits listed on a processor page should be those that are in the processor, i.e. in the bootrom. I suggest that we create iOS version pages and put these exploits in there. Anyone against this? -- [[User:Http|http]] 14:23, 24 October 2012 (MDT) |
||
| + | :I agree, except for that last bit. I think it'd be better to list the software-based vulnerabilities all on one page, and split into different sections based on which firmwares they're exploited on. --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 23:29, 24 October 2012 (MDT) |
||
Revision as of 05:29, 25 October 2012
Why is an exploit listed on a processor page? (Same applies to the other processors.) The Raccoon exploit is in no way related to the processor. Can we remove that here and everywhere? The only vulnerabilites or exploits listed on a processor page should be those that are in the processor, i.e. in the bootrom. I suggest that we create iOS version pages and put these exploits in there. Anyone against this? -- http 14:23, 24 October 2012 (MDT)
- I agree, except for that last bit. I think it'd be better to list the software-based vulnerabilities all on one page, and split into different sections based on which firmwares they're exploited on. --Dialexio 23:29, 24 October 2012 (MDT)
