Difference between revisions of "Talk:M68AP"

From The iPhone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Naming conventions for first generation iPhone: new section)
(Naming conventions for first generation iPhone)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
== Naming conventions for first generation iPhone ==
 
== Naming conventions for first generation iPhone ==
   
Should the 1st gen iPhone really be named iPhone 2G? After all, technically the 3G enabled iPhone is the chronological "iPhone 2G" isn't it. Just a thought I had. [[User:Rekoil|Rekoil]] 12:06, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
+
Should the 1st gen iPhone really be named iPhone 2G? Edge technology is normally referred to as 2.5G anyway. And after all, technically the 3G enabled iPhone is the chronological "iPhone 2G" isn't it. Was just thinking it might cause some confusion in the future.
  +
I think G1 iPhone and G2 iPhone for the 3G enabled device (or iPhone gen1 and iPhone gen2, respectively) would be a good way to refer to them.
  +
[[User:Rekoil|Rekoil]] 12:06, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:11, 19 March 2009

Screenshot

Isn't that screenshot from the wrong version? -Vaumnou

Re: Screenshot

It's 2.0 on a 3G iPhone. But 2.0 3G is the same as 2.0 M68AP so it doesn't matter.

- wEsTbAeR--

aha

thanks for pointing that out. for the sake of being clear though, i will edit it accordingly.

ChronicDev 03:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)



On the back of mine it says modelA1203

Naming conventions for first generation iPhone

Should the 1st gen iPhone really be named iPhone 2G? Edge technology is normally referred to as 2.5G anyway. And after all, technically the 3G enabled iPhone is the chronological "iPhone 2G" isn't it. Was just thinking it might cause some confusion in the future. I think G1 iPhone and G2 iPhone for the 3G enabled device (or iPhone gen1 and iPhone gen2, respectively) would be a good way to refer to them. Rekoil 12:06, 19 March 2009 (UTC)