The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Malformed CFF Vulnerability"
(rename comment) |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
How about using 'Malformed CFF Font Vulnerability' and keep this page an a redirect? And we need to make sure it is listed all over the wiki or nobody will find it! It's quite a name :D [[User:Windows Helpdesk|blackthund3r]] 05:45, 12 October 2010 (UTC) |
How about using 'Malformed CFF Font Vulnerability' and keep this page an a redirect? And we need to make sure it is listed all over the wiki or nobody will find it! It's quite a name :D [[User:Windows Helpdesk|blackthund3r]] 05:45, 12 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | I support [[User:Dialexio|Dialexio]]'s name (without "Font", because that's contained in CFF). We also don't need a redirect from the old page if all links get updated. Or are there any known links to it on external pages? --[[User:Http|http]] 07:23, 12 October 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:23, 12 October 2010
New name?
I'm not a fan of the article's name, as it somewhat implies that the vulnerability involves the PDF parser, so I was thinking about renaming the article. Does anyone else agree? If so, are there any name suggestions? I'm partial to "Malformed CFF Font Vulnerability." --Dialexio 03:40, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
I agree as this is misleading. Or even just "Safari CFF Font Stack Overflow".
How about using 'Malformed CFF Font Vulnerability' and keep this page an a redirect? And we need to make sure it is listed all over the wiki or nobody will find it! It's quite a name :D blackthund3r 05:45, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
I support Dialexio's name (without "Font", because that's contained in CFF). We also don't need a redirect from the old page if all links get updated. Or are there any known links to it on external pages? --http 07:23, 12 October 2010 (UTC)