Difference between revisions of "Talk:IBoot (Bootloader)"

From The iPhone Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Article name: new section)
(Article name)
Line 7: Line 7:
   
 
I'm not a big fan of the new name, so I'd like to propose a name change to "iBoot (Stage 2 Bootloader)." Would this be fine with others? --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 00:29, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 
I'm not a big fan of the new name, so I'd like to propose a name change to "iBoot (Stage 2 Bootloader)." Would this be fine with others? --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 00:29, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
  +
  +
-- For me it was just important to separate the two iBoot's. That was very confusing. For me your suggestion would be ok. --[[User:Http|http]] 06:19, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:19, 21 October 2010

Commands used as an exploit vector

the armv7 go and stop do not have vectors you just point at the kernelcache and boot --liamchat 21:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

the usb_control_msg(0x21, 2) Exploit has a vector and there may be lots of tiny write zones in iboot --liamchat 21:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Article name

I'm not a big fan of the new name, so I'd like to propose a name change to "iBoot (Stage 2 Bootloader)." Would this be fine with others? --Dialexio 00:29, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

-- For me it was just important to separate the two iBoot's. That was very confusing. For me your suggestion would be ok. --http 06:19, 21 October 2010 (UTC)