|
The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pwnage 2.0"
(→Merge Request) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:It's a different exploit than [[Pwnage]] if I understood this correctly. Every exploit should have its own page. --[[User:Http|http]] 21:47, 23 October 2010 (UTC) |
:It's a different exploit than [[Pwnage]] if I understood this correctly. Every exploit should have its own page. --[[User:Http|http]] 21:47, 23 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
::Yes, but pwnage2.0 is listed and defined here. --[[User:Palz|Palz]] 21:49, 23 October 2010 (UTC) |
::Yes, but pwnage2.0 is listed and defined here. --[[User:Palz|Palz]] 21:49, 23 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | :::What? I don't see what you mean. [[Pwnage]] and [[Pwnage 2.0]] are two different exploits, each with its own page. Or am I wrong? --[[User:Http|http]] 21:53, 23 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 21:53, 23 October 2010
Can anyone post the file structure for the certificate and the malformed certificate? --paulzero 06:24, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Merge Request
Shouldn't this be merged with Pwnage? --Palz 21:23, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- It's a different exploit than Pwnage if I understood this correctly. Every exploit should have its own page. --http 21:47, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, but pwnage2.0 is listed and defined here. --Palz 21:49, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- What? I don't see what you mean. Pwnage and Pwnage 2.0 are two different exploits, each with its own page. Or am I wrong? --http 21:53, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, but pwnage2.0 is listed and defined here. --Palz 21:49, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
