The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:/dev"
(→Split the table?) |
|||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
It looks like maintaining the table for the future is going to get a bit messy. Therefore, I would like to propose splitting the table based on file name. Does this sound good to everyone? --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 22:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC) |
It looks like maintaining the table for the future is going to get a bit messy. Therefore, I would like to propose splitting the table based on file name. Does this sound good to everyone? --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 22:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
:i think it look ok for now because when i started the page it was upside and when more info is found about the node's then we can split the table's --[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 22:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC) |
:i think it look ok for now because when i started the page it was upside and when more info is found about the node's then we can split the table's --[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 22:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | == progress == |
||
+ | can we use this to keep track of what node's are for witch devices and the proof of it --[[User:Liamchat|liamchat]] 23:16, 26 October 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | {| class="sortable" style="table-layout: fixed; border-collapse: collapse;" border="1" |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | ! device's |
||
+ | | [[m68ap|iPhone]] |
||
+ | | [[n82ap|iPhone3G]] |
||
+ | | [[n88ap|iPhone 3G S]] |
||
+ | | [[n90ap|iPhone 4]] |
||
+ | | [[n45ap|iPod touch]] |
||
+ | | [[n72ap|iPod touch 2G]] |
||
+ | | [[n18ap|iPod touch 3G]] |
||
+ | | [[n81ap|iPod touch 4G]] |
||
+ | | [[k48ap|iPad]] |
||
+ | | [[k66ap|Apple TV]] |
||
+ | |- |
||
+ | | data from |
||
+ | | {{no}} |
||
+ | | {{no}} |
||
+ | | {{yes}} |
||
+ | | {{yes}} [http://yfrog.com/757o7p] [http://yfrog.com/0eqlop] [http://yfrog.com/hqzyjp] |
||
+ | | {{no}} |
||
+ | | {{yes}} [http://yfrog.com/n151ip] [http://yfrog.com/4ztofp] |
||
+ | | {{no}} |
||
+ | | {{no}} |
||
+ | | {{no}} |
||
+ | | {{no}} |
||
+ | |- |
Revision as of 23:16, 26 October 2010
Contents
Importance
Is this page really that important? I think this should be merged into something else (sans the folder structure). LiNK 22:47, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- This page is more useful for app developer's ( e.g ultrasnow need's /dev/tty.debug to work ) and it these node's change per type of device --liamchat 23:01, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Devices that the Nodes were gathered from
Can we say witch devices have the nodes because it will get confusing once the page is complete --liamchat 22:56, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Let's try with [1]--Ryccardo 14:09, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hey, I don't think colors are a good thing. A lot of devices are available on all models. We should make a table row for every device and use Yes and No.--Ryccardo 19:13, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- Can someone please change {{partial|ipad 3g}} to {{partial|[[K48ap|iPad Wifi+3G}} ? --Balloonhead66 22:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Table
I was thinking that after every like 40 nodes, we add another one of these things to keep things organized. --Balloonhead66 22:29, 26 October 2010 (UTC) | |- ! Node |
Split the table?
It looks like maintaining the table for the future is going to get a bit messy. Therefore, I would like to propose splitting the table based on file name. Does this sound good to everyone? --Dialexio 22:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- i think it look ok for now because when i started the page it was upside and when more info is found about the node's then we can split the table's --liamchat 22:58, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
progress
can we use this to keep track of what node's are for witch devices and the proof of it --liamchat 23:16, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
device's | iPhone | iPhone3G | iPhone 3G S | iPhone 4 | iPod touch | iPod touch 2G | iPod touch 3G | iPod touch 4G | iPad | Apple TV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
data from | No | No | Yes | Yes [2] [3] [4] | No | Yes [5] [6] | No | No | No | No |