|
The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Liamchat"
m (→Ban liamchat request: XHTML DEMANDS XHTML SYNTAX, and made the table sortable (so we can see pros/cons better).) |
(→Ban liamchat request) |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| He helps out this wiki alot |
| He helps out this wiki alot |
||
| [[User:Balloonhead66|Balloonhead66]] |
| [[User:Balloonhead66|Balloonhead66]] |
||
| + | |- |
||
| + | | {{yes|Pro}} |
||
| + | | He tested software to help developers |
||
| + | | [[User:liamchat|liamchat]] |
||
| + | |- |
||
| + | | {{yes|Pro}} |
||
| + | | He added iv/keys that where old and ignored |
||
| + | | [[User:liamchat|liamchat]] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| {{partial|Somewhat}} |
| {{partial|Somewhat}} |
||
Revision as of 23:39, 17 November 2010
Contents |
|
Archives |
| • 2010 • 2011 • |
KBAGs
Hello, Liamchat! I noticed that you've been adding KBAGs to the key pages. I certainly appreciate the addition of such information, but just listing KBAGs without mentioning which file they're for isn't exactly helpful. Would you mind mentioning which file each KBAG is for? --Dialexio 21:39, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
- i added them because i don't have those devices and i think it may help people get the key's if i add them however the exact is
- 018-7074-092.dmg:
- 018-7082-092.dmg:
- DeviceTree.n90ap.img3:
- LLB.n90ap.RELEASE.img3:
- applelogo-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- batterycharging0-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- batterycharging1-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- batteryfull-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- batterylow0-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- batterylow1-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- glyphcharging-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- glyphplugin-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
- iBEC.n90ap.RELEASE.dfu:
- iBSS.n90ap.RELEASE.dfu:
- iBoot.n90ap.RELEASE.img3:
- kernelcache.release.n81:
- recoverymode-640x960.s5l8930x.img3:
--liamchat 22:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Ban liamchat request
There is a petition going on to ban liamchat from this wiki. I'm not sure how serious it is and nobody can vote for him there. So please comment here, pro and contra, preferrably with arguments. I think five users more against him with serious arguments would be enough. --http 22:05, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- ??? Why would you ban him? I havn't seen anything wrong he has done... Please give more info... --Balloonhead66 22:15, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- I don't understand it ether but I do help by filling in the missing keys and check the Current ones --liamchat 22:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Please fill out this table with info... use
{{yes|Pro}}for a pro,{{no|Con}}for a con, or{{partial|Somewhat}}for a ehh... in the first column
- Please fill out this table with info... use
- I don't understand it ether but I do help by filling in the missing keys and check the Current ones --liamchat 22:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
| Pro/Con | What it is | Adder |
|---|---|---|
| Pro | He helps out this wiki alot | Balloonhead66 |
| Pro | He tested software to help developers | liamchat |
| Pro | He added iv/keys that where old and ignored | liamchat |
| Somewhat | He needs to work on formatting | Balloonhead66 |
| Con | He isn't putting information we need, and just cluttering the overall wiki | ifish |
- Just to make it clear: Nobody will be banned just because others don't like someone. For a ban we need a clear majority of people with good arguments. --http 22:52, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
