The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Whiteshinyapple"
(Removing all content from page) |
(→Deleting many valid infos: new section) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | == Deleting many valid infos == |
||
+ | |||
+ | Hi! I noticed you deleted lots of valid information. I mean for example this: |
||
+ | *[http://theiphonewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Sn0wbreeze&curid=831&diff=13173&oldid=13172&rcid=13380 Sn0wbreeze device list, problems] |
||
+ | *[http://theiphonewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=F0recast&curid=891&diff=13168&oldid=12738&rcid=13375 F0recast] |
||
+ | *[http://theiphonewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=F0recast&curid=891&diff=13168&oldid=12738&rcid=13375 ECID (format string)] |
||
+ | *[http://theiphonewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=DFU_Mode&curid=23&diff=13222&oldid=13190&rcid=13431 Info about software DFU mode] |
||
+ | *[http://theiphonewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=ECID&curid=684&diff=13228&oldid=13175&rcid=13437 Info about Saurik IP - actually belongs somewhere else] |
||
+ | *[http://theiphonewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Bootrom&curid=806&diff=13233&oldid=11273&rcid=13442 Determining bootrom by serial number] |
||
+ | *[http://theiphonewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Bootrom&curid=806&diff=13237&oldid=13236&rcid=13446 Bootrom version for 1G] |
||
+ | I know there were no bad intentions. You probably just wanted to "clean up". I think we shouln't delete such information, even if it's old. Maybe just reformulate it or say that it's valid only for old devices or whatever would be enough. Don't you think? --[[User:Http|http]] 12:43, 19 November 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:43, 19 November 2010
Deleting many valid infos
Hi! I noticed you deleted lots of valid information. I mean for example this:
- Sn0wbreeze device list, problems
- F0recast
- ECID (format string)
- Info about software DFU mode
- Info about Saurik IP - actually belongs somewhere else
- Determining bootrom by serial number
- Bootrom version for 1G
I know there were no bad intentions. You probably just wanted to "clean up". I think we shouln't delete such information, even if it's old. Maybe just reformulate it or say that it's valid only for old devices or whatever would be enough. Don't you think? --http 12:43, 19 November 2010 (UTC)