The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Whiteshinyapple"
(→Deleting many valid infos: new section) |
(→Deleting many valid infos) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*[http://theiphonewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Bootrom&curid=806&diff=13237&oldid=13236&rcid=13446 Bootrom version for 1G] |
*[http://theiphonewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Bootrom&curid=806&diff=13237&oldid=13236&rcid=13446 Bootrom version for 1G] |
||
I know there were no bad intentions. You probably just wanted to "clean up". I think we shouln't delete such information, even if it's old. Maybe just reformulate it or say that it's valid only for old devices or whatever would be enough. Don't you think? --[[User:Http|http]] 12:43, 19 November 2010 (UTC) |
I know there were no bad intentions. You probably just wanted to "clean up". I think we shouln't delete such information, even if it's old. Maybe just reformulate it or say that it's valid only for old devices or whatever would be enough. Don't you think? --[[User:Http|http]] 12:43, 19 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | :The valid information was deleted because it was fixed and they have been solved.Deleted some info for ECID because it had misleading sections.anyway ill follow your advice :) and kindly look at the candidates for deletion page as i think it should be looked on -- [[User:Whiteshinyapple|Whiteshinyapple]] |
Revision as of 12:51, 19 November 2010
Deleting many valid infos
Hi! I noticed you deleted lots of valid information. I mean for example this:
- Sn0wbreeze device list, problems
- F0recast
- ECID (format string)
- Info about software DFU mode
- Info about Saurik IP - actually belongs somewhere else
- Determining bootrom by serial number
- Bootrom version for 1G
I know there were no bad intentions. You probably just wanted to "clean up". I think we shouln't delete such information, even if it's old. Maybe just reformulate it or say that it's valid only for old devices or whatever would be enough. Don't you think? --http 12:43, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- The valid information was deleted because it was fixed and they have been solved.Deleted some info for ECID because it had misleading sections.anyway ill follow your advice :) and kindly look at the candidates for deletion page as i think it should be looked on -- Whiteshinyapple