The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "User talk:IAdam1n"
(Archived.) |
m (Reverted edits by Adaminsull (talk) to last revision by Http) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | == Signing pages == |
||
− | {{Talk Archive|2012|2013}} |
||
+ | Please use <code><nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki></code> to sign your talk page entries. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] 15:56, 2 December 2012 (MST) |
||
+ | : I will but my page is not needing it. --[[User:Adaminsull|Adaminsull]] 16:04, 2 December 2012 (MST) |
||
+ | :: I think everyone here can agree; Anywhere you post on the wiki should be signed --[[User:Haifisch|Haifisch]] 16:09, 2 December 2012 (MST) |
||
+ | ::: I will sign on talk pages next time. I also have the last 2 days. --[[User:Adaminsull|Adaminsull]] 16:14, 2 December 2012 (MST) |
||
+ | :::: The last signature on [[Talk:AES_Keys]] was signed incorrectly by the way --[[User:Haifisch|Haifisch]] 16:19, 2 December 2012 (MST) |
||
+ | ::::: Ok. I understand. --[[User:Adaminsull|Adaminsull]] 16:20, 2 December 2012 (MST) |
||
+ | |||
+ | == Flood == |
||
+ | Watch what you flood. The OTA Update is set up so the amount of edits you did isn't necessary. Please be more conscious. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] 22:09, 3 December 2012 (MST)<br /> |
||
+ | I know that there are a '''''lot''''' of devices and firmwares to add whenever Apple releases an iOS update, but please try to limit your number of edits in a short timespan in the future. Section 4.7 in the Ground rules actually sets a limit for the amount of edits you're permitted to make at a time, though exceptions can be made. I am aware that parts of the wiki (particularly [[Firmware]]) unfortunately force a large number of edits. However, firmware updates are not exempt from the limit, and fewer edits could have been made to add 6.1b3 for all devices to [[Beta Firmware]]. Thanks! :) --[[User:Dialexio|<span style="color:#C20; font-weight:normal;">Dialexio</span>]] 22:40, 3 December 2012 (MST) |
||
+ | : OK but how do you do it with less? --[[User:Adaminsull|Adaminsull]] 01:38, 4 December 2012 (MST) |
||
+ | : I see, I didnt know you could do it all at once. Next time I will do that. --[[User:Adaminsull|Adaminsull]] 02:00, 4 December 2012 (MST) |
||
+ | |||
+ | == Edit War - First Warning == |
||
+ | On the page [[IPSW File Format]] and on [[Sn0wbreeze]] you started an edit war. We can't tolerate this here. I don't want to discuss here which version is correct, but if someone undoes your edit, don't change it back, but start a discussion on its Talk page. Only after a public agreement we can then change the page. You did create the talk page, but also changed the page itself. That doesn't stop the edit war. Imagine that everybody, together with a comment on the talk page, would edit the page again. That doesn't work. We want to be civilized here. If you continue with this behaviour, we'll need to block you. As I was involved in these edits, I won't issue the blocking; I don't want to use my admin status to have my version go through. But I'm sure another admin will block you if this goes on. Treat this as a warning. Everybody makes mistakes, just don't repeat them. --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 13:06, 7 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | : Ok. I will do that next time. I just dont like things being wrong. --[[User:Adaminsull|adaminsull]] ([[User talk:Adaminsull|talk]]) 13:09, 7 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | == Edit War - Second Warning == |
||
+ | You just started another edit war by recreating a page that someone deleted. Even if the deletion was not correct, you can't simply change or edit it back (unless the other edit was spam or you're an admin). We don't want this bad behaviour here. If there are different opinions - and none is "better" than any other, just maybe more accepted - then discuss. If this happens a third time, I'll issue a temporary block. Thanks for your understanding. --[[User:Http|http]] ([[User talk:Http|talk]]) 12:16, 26 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | == Redirect deletion marks == |
||
+ | Do NOT mark a redirect for deletion if it has pages linking to it. It destroys the redirect and instead renders a numerical list like: |
||
+ | 1. REDIRECT [[Template:see also]] |
||
+ | For it to be a redirect, Mediawiki REQUIRES that the first line be <code>#REDIRECT [[<nowiki/>xxx]]</code> and there be nothing else. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 00:22, 17 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | : I didnt want a redirect. --[[User:Adaminsull|adaminsull]] ([[User talk:Adaminsull|talk]]) 08:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | == [[Unlock]] and [[Jailbreak]] edits == |
||
+ | |||
+ | Those edits were useful, but weren't put together "nicely". You used a link shortener, not the actual link, and the grammar is bad. Plus, that doesn't seem like the right place for those notes. --[[User:5urd|5urd]] ([[User talk:5urd|talk]]) 00:00, 26 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
+ | : Well users should know. --[[User:Adaminsull|adaminsull]] ([[User talk:Adaminsull|talk]]) 00:38, 26 January 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:40, 17 February 2013
Contents
Signing pages
Please use --~~~~
to sign your talk page entries. --5urd 15:56, 2 December 2012 (MST)
- I will but my page is not needing it. --Adaminsull 16:04, 2 December 2012 (MST)
- I think everyone here can agree; Anywhere you post on the wiki should be signed --Haifisch 16:09, 2 December 2012 (MST)
- I will sign on talk pages next time. I also have the last 2 days. --Adaminsull 16:14, 2 December 2012 (MST)
- The last signature on Talk:AES_Keys was signed incorrectly by the way --Haifisch 16:19, 2 December 2012 (MST)
- Ok. I understand. --Adaminsull 16:20, 2 December 2012 (MST)
- The last signature on Talk:AES_Keys was signed incorrectly by the way --Haifisch 16:19, 2 December 2012 (MST)
- I will sign on talk pages next time. I also have the last 2 days. --Adaminsull 16:14, 2 December 2012 (MST)
- I think everyone here can agree; Anywhere you post on the wiki should be signed --Haifisch 16:09, 2 December 2012 (MST)
Flood
Watch what you flood. The OTA Update is set up so the amount of edits you did isn't necessary. Please be more conscious. --5urd 22:09, 3 December 2012 (MST)
I know that there are a lot of devices and firmwares to add whenever Apple releases an iOS update, but please try to limit your number of edits in a short timespan in the future. Section 4.7 in the Ground rules actually sets a limit for the amount of edits you're permitted to make at a time, though exceptions can be made. I am aware that parts of the wiki (particularly Firmware) unfortunately force a large number of edits. However, firmware updates are not exempt from the limit, and fewer edits could have been made to add 6.1b3 for all devices to Beta Firmware. Thanks! :) --Dialexio 22:40, 3 December 2012 (MST)
- OK but how do you do it with less? --Adaminsull 01:38, 4 December 2012 (MST)
- I see, I didnt know you could do it all at once. Next time I will do that. --Adaminsull 02:00, 4 December 2012 (MST)
Edit War - First Warning
On the page IPSW File Format and on Sn0wbreeze you started an edit war. We can't tolerate this here. I don't want to discuss here which version is correct, but if someone undoes your edit, don't change it back, but start a discussion on its Talk page. Only after a public agreement we can then change the page. You did create the talk page, but also changed the page itself. That doesn't stop the edit war. Imagine that everybody, together with a comment on the talk page, would edit the page again. That doesn't work. We want to be civilized here. If you continue with this behaviour, we'll need to block you. As I was involved in these edits, I won't issue the blocking; I don't want to use my admin status to have my version go through. But I'm sure another admin will block you if this goes on. Treat this as a warning. Everybody makes mistakes, just don't repeat them. --http (talk) 13:06, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
- Ok. I will do that next time. I just dont like things being wrong. --adaminsull (talk) 13:09, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Edit War - Second Warning
You just started another edit war by recreating a page that someone deleted. Even if the deletion was not correct, you can't simply change or edit it back (unless the other edit was spam or you're an admin). We don't want this bad behaviour here. If there are different opinions - and none is "better" than any other, just maybe more accepted - then discuss. If this happens a third time, I'll issue a temporary block. Thanks for your understanding. --http (talk) 12:16, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Redirect deletion marks
Do NOT mark a redirect for deletion if it has pages linking to it. It destroys the redirect and instead renders a numerical list like:
1. REDIRECT Template:see also
For it to be a redirect, Mediawiki REQUIRES that the first line be #REDIRECT [[xxx]]
and there be nothing else. --5urd (talk) 00:22, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- I didnt want a redirect. --adaminsull (talk) 08:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Unlock and Jailbreak edits
Those edits were useful, but weren't put together "nicely". You used a link shortener, not the actual link, and the grammar is bad. Plus, that doesn't seem like the right place for those notes. --5urd (talk) 00:00, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
- Well users should know. --adaminsull (talk) 00:38, 26 January 2013 (UTC)