|
The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tethered jailbreak"
Revolution (talk | contribs) |
Revolution (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
thats probably what revolution implied :P [[User:ChronicDev|ChronicDev]] 03:05, 16 October 2009 (UTC) |
thats probably what revolution implied :P [[User:ChronicDev|ChronicDev]] 03:05, 16 October 2009 (UTC) |
||
| − | Really I think no work at all since nitrokey published the exploit being kept in secret I think no work should be done so there is no risk of any compromise. and secondly if nitrokey got access to an unpublished exploit twice I think that there should be more security about all of this. Since nitrokey stole the a baseband exploit and a bootrom exploit. [[User:Revolution|Revolution]] 04:02, 16 October 2009 (UTC) |
+ | Really I think no work at all since nitrokey published the exploit being kept in secret I think no work should be done so there is no risk of any compromise. and secondly if nitrokey got access to an unpublished exploit twice I think that there should be more security about all of this. Since nitrokey stole the a baseband exploit and a bootrom exploit. Soz about my rambling Im very tired [[User:Revolution|Revolution]] 04:02, 16 October 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:02, 16 October 2009
I suggest no work should be done on making it untethered until the iphone 3,1 is released. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by Revolution (talk) 01:01, October 15, 2009 (EST). Please consult this page for more info on how to sign pages, and how to fix this.
No work done until iPhone3,1? That's a stretch. How about no public-work / for release until iPhone 3,1. If no jailbreakable iPhone3,1 in July, then no upgrade (for me) from iPhone2,1 :) . Iemit737 02:49, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thats probably what revolution implied :P ChronicDev 03:05, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Really I think no work at all since nitrokey published the exploit being kept in secret I think no work should be done so there is no risk of any compromise. and secondly if nitrokey got access to an unpublished exploit twice I think that there should be more security about all of this. Since nitrokey stole the a baseband exploit and a bootrom exploit. Soz about my rambling Im very tired Revolution 04:02, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
