|
The iPhone Wiki is no longer updated. Visit this article on The Apple Wiki for current information. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Usb control msg(0xA1, 1) Exploit"
(What this gives us. Besides awesomeness) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
So would this exploit lead to a tethered jailbreak or would it be untethered? --[[User:JacobVengeance|JacobVengeance]] 01:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC) |
So would this exploit lead to a tethered jailbreak or would it be untethered? --[[User:JacobVengeance|JacobVengeance]] 01:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | Tethered. This just allows unsigned code execution to be performed regardless of SHSH or model revision at the DFU/bootrom level. This is useful for redsn0w or blackra1n type hacks as they provide a quick and unclosable exploit to perform the actual jailbreak. Functionally, this replaces the need for sending 2.1.1 iBSS + iBEC to use Arm7Go or the 3.1.2 iBSS/iBEC (if that can even be done?) for that other USB control msg exploit in 3.1.2 iBoot. [[User:Iemit737|Iemit737]] 02:37, 21 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 02:37, 21 September 2010
Is this even suppose to be here? :S
iH8sn0w 00:31, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- Pod2g posted it himself so I don't see much of a problem for it as it doesn't sound like it will work on new devices. --OMEGA_RAZER
So would this exploit lead to a tethered jailbreak or would it be untethered? --JacobVengeance 01:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Tethered. This just allows unsigned code execution to be performed regardless of SHSH or model revision at the DFU/bootrom level. This is useful for redsn0w or blackra1n type hacks as they provide a quick and unclosable exploit to perform the actual jailbreak. Functionally, this replaces the need for sending 2.1.1 iBSS + iBEC to use Arm7Go or the 3.1.2 iBSS/iBEC (if that can even be done?) for that other USB control msg exploit in 3.1.2 iBoot. Iemit737 02:37, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
